We Got It Wrong: Paul Romer and William Nordhaus share the 2018 Nobel Prize in Economics.

Alex: No! I was right! ….A year ahead of time. Clearly, I was just predicting the future. Paul Romer is a Nobel Laureate for “integrating technological innovations into long-run macroeconomic analysis.” Remember when I talked about the impact of innovations in South Korea in our 2017 predictions? How they were on the cutting edge with dancing robots and freaky horror movies? I totally knew Romer would be getting a Nobel soon…even if I got the year wrong. Want to bet my choice for this year – Kevin Murphy – receives the prize in 2019?

But my imperfect prophetic skills aren’t nearly as interesting as the fact that Romer and Nordhaus were granted this award together.  Why were these two economists grouped together for a prize? What brings a climate change economist that advocates for the carbon tax together with an economist who contributed to the Solow growth model?

It’s because of how their individual works together impacted government policy.

Romer argued that innovation has a huge impact on economic growth. But how do we foster innovation? Intellectual property rights can be used to incentivize more market investment in R and D projects. However, if property rights prevent potential entrepreneurs from entering the market they can actually strangle future innovations. For example, Romer looked at the impact of health insurance on medical innovations, trying to determine whether governments are underinvesting in the market for scientists and engineers, and what alternatives exist for fostering innovation.

Romer didn’t stick to just writing about fostering innovation though. In 2000, he created the company Aplia to improve students interactions in the online classroom through homework and courses. This was later sold to Cengage Learning.

Kenzi: So I was wrong as well, but after reading about William Nordhaus, I think the Committee chose well. Nordhaus won the Nobel Prize for his work on the economics of climate change. Who knew there was such a field? Let alone that it is revolutionary enough to win the prize. Really, this should not come as a surprise to us because #economicsiseverywhere. Nevertheless, his work made a great impact in cost-benefit analysis of the diminishing ozone layer, global warming, and all things #green.

Nordhaus created the Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy model which “integrates in an end-to-end fashion the economics, carbon cycle, climate science, and impacts in a highly aggregated model that allows a weighing of the costs and benefits of taking steps to slow greenhouse warming.” His model is used by the Environmental Protection Agency to craft better policies for clean energy in the least costly way to producers and consumers.

Fascinating side note: Nordhaus was the first economist to study the economic significance of the light bulb.  He started with the prehistoric way of creating light, a wood fire.  He documents the cost of each method to study how prices change over time. He ended his experiment with the modern light bulb. Tim Harford summarizes his findings writing, “A thing that was once too precious to use is now too cheap to notice.” I love economics.

Kathryn: I mean…I said I was going to be wrong when I made my prediction, so no real surprise there. But I also think that the committee was right to recognize the timeliness of Romer’s and Nordhaus’s work. Both Romer and Nordhaus developed models that analyzed the interaction of the market within its broader context of government regulation, business incentives and even nature. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences press release stated these two economists were selected as they had both “designed methods addressing some of our time’s most basic and pressing questions about how we create long-term sustained and sustainable economic growth.” From patents to light bulbs, the research of Romer and Nordhaus aims to illuminate how economics and policy impact the world around us and how we can best achieve prosperity and human flourishing.

Which is exactly what we here at ReasonablEconomics try to do as well by bringing you blog posts aimed at revealing the hidden economics in your world! So where’s our Nobel prize, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences? (Perhaps they’re waiting for the mean author age of our site to increase just a little…don’t want to give out a lifetime achievement award too early!)

Still, maybe if Alex puts us on his list of future Nobel prize winners we’ll win…eventually.

The Truth Behind Facebook Arguments

I confess: I’m addicted to the battlefield that is the Facebook comments section. Maybe I need to go see a psychiatrist, but the moment I discover a comment thread where two wildly different ideas clash, my interest is immediately piqued. I even enjoy a healthy dose of schadenfreude whenever a conversation devolves into personal attacks. Continue reading “The Truth Behind Facebook Arguments”

ReasonablEconomics Advice for Mother’s Day

By Kevin D. Gomez and Alex Kanode

Mother’s Day is around the corner…like, tomorrow. Some of y’all may be panicking as we speak, thinking about what to buy the mothers in your life. Maybe you’ve read a clever economist’s argument that the best gift is cash and you’re thinking to Venmo your mom some dough. Continue reading “ReasonablEconomics Advice for Mother’s Day”

Dale T. Mortensen-You Gotta Work Before You Work

Lately I’ve been knee deep in the process of job searching. Let me tell you guys, this is an ordeal. Although most people don’t think about it this way, finding a job is very costly! It’s a difficult process with a lot of what economists would call unseen costs. There are the costs of finding jobs that match my interests and skills. Then the cost of sending out my resume and applications to as many job opportunities I can get my hands on. Next, there are the costs of interviews to see if I’m a good match for the position. This takes a lot of time and sometimes I’m just not motivated to overcome all these costs.

Continue reading “Dale T. Mortensen-You Gotta Work Before You Work”

Leonid Hurwicz: A Defense of the Swindlers of Snowmageddon

For North and South Carolinians, the new year brought forth new problems: the snowmageddon. The winter storm of 2018 covered the whole east coast including cities that do not see snow often. Folks in Charleston and Wilmington were in panic mode as they struggled to navigate the white, slippery roads. The beach bums were woefully underprepared. Every time a disaster like this strikes, the same old arguments arise. Of course, I’m talking about how to get goods to the people who need them the most. You might have seen it in headlines as price gouging. Continue reading “Leonid Hurwicz: A Defense of the Swindlers of Snowmageddon”

Douglass North: How Did We Even Get Here?

The iPhone X just came out yesterday. This phone costs $999, has insane processing power, and has facial recognition that can be used to unlock the phone and make purchases. Technofears and privacy debates aside, this is a marvel of technology. I promise this isn’t an Apple commercial, I’m just taking a moment to be astounded at how far we’ve come today. Continue reading “Douglass North: How Did We Even Get Here?”